Router Plane

Monday, October 9, 2023

Celtic Knot – #2 Proof of Concept & a Problem

The proof of concept starts by taking piece of cherry for the body out of my “save-for-later” box and milling it to just under ¾” square and about a foot long.  A piece of maple from the same box is milled to the same thickness as the planned total thickness of the three-layer stack. 

The first step is to set a jig up on the table saw to make the 40-degree cut through the body.  To set the angle an adjustable triangle from my drafting days and a Sliding T-Bevel are used.  The photos show how the triangle is set and held against the table saw rip fence to set the Sliding T-Bevel to 40-degrees.

Using the Sliding T-Bevel the fence on the jig is set to the 40-degree angle making sure the T-Bevel’s edge is tight to the blade without touching any teeth and the handle is up tight to the jig’s fence. 

Next the jig’s stop block is set so about 2” of the blank’s body will get cut off.  It’s important that this setup is not changed from here on out so all the pieces that make up the knot are properly aligned.  A sliding clamp is used to hold the blank securely in place while the cut is being made.

Gluing up is done using this jig to keep the cherry parts aligned.  The jig’s base has the top layer covered with packing tape and the top backstop is covered with a vinyl surface neither of which the glue sticks to.

To use glue is applied to the cherry pieces then the maple piece is set between them hanging over on the far and near faces of the cherry.  The two horizontal orange clamps pull the cherry tight to the backstop and the blue clamp pulls the three pieces tight together.  The notch in the backstop lets the maple piece extend beyond the face of the cherry without interfering with the cherry faces alignment. 

After letting the glue cure overnight, the clamps are removed and here are two views of what the piece looks like.  Note that the maple piece that was down during glue-up (side 3) is flush with the cherry while the other three sides of the maple piece are proud of the cherry.  You can also see numbers on the cherry faces.  Each of the four faces are numbers one through four and I will explain what they are for in just a bit.

Before moving on to the next step all the edges of the maple have to be brought down flush with the cherry.  That’s done with a no-set pull saw followed by some light sanding using a sanding block with 120 grit paper.

Making the cut for the second piece of maple is next.  Here is where the numbers come in.  The blank is put back in the jig butted up against the stop with the number two up.  The first piece was cut with the number one up, this time the cut is made with the number two up.  The same process will be used later for faces three and four. 

Once cut the glue-up process is the same as with face one.

After the glue cures the blank gets unclamped and the maple edges are trimmed flush with the cherry body using the no-set pull saw followed by some light sanding.  The top photo shows faces one and two with the meeting corners (red arrows) of the maple and cherry all lining up as expected.  However, in the middle photo one of the joints did not line up as expected.  The vertical maple piece on face 4 identified by the top red arrow should be over to the right so it meets the vertical piece identified by the bottom red arrow.  Now that’s a problem which when the cut was made for face three really showed up since the vertical maple pieces on the cut face (circled in red) should line up and they clearly don’t.  At first, I was at a loss for why since the 3D drawing did not show this as a problem.  After a thinking about it for a while I think I know what happened.  Because I wanted the individual lines of the knot to be thin the thickness of the maple piece is .085” thick but the saw kerf is listed on the blade as .125”.  This means that each time I make a cut and glue the maple piece in there is a net loss of .068”.  I know the difference between .125” and .085” is only .04” but due to the angled cuts the actual loss is .068”.  This matches up with the photo in that the offset is slightly less than the .085” thickness of the maple piece.  By the time I make fourth and last cut I think the difference will be a lot more and any possibility of getting a Celtic knot out this test piece is gone.  However, I am going to go ahead and finish it up then turn it round to see what the results look like.

Here the top two photos are after the third piece of maple has been glued in place and brought down flush with the cherry.  The bottom photo shows after the cut has been made so the fourth maple piece can be inserted.  As you can see the alignment of the maple pieces is getting more and more out of whack.  It will be interesting to see just how bad the pieces will be misaligned after the fourth piece is glued in place.

While the glue was curing, I made a cut on the table saw in a scrap piece using the same blade as I use when making the four angled cuts above.  Now the blade says it makes a .125” kerf but having been burned once when the maple inlay didn’t match the blade kerf, I wanted to make darn sure it matched this time.  The top photo below shows what thickness piece of maple fit in place with no slop and it’s not .125” but is a little thicker at .1305”.  The bottom photo shows the piece milled to fit in the saw kerf.  Now I know the difference is only about five thousandths of an inch but as there are four cuts the total difference is .020” and that’s about the thickness of my fingernail.  Nevertheless, because the finished Celtic knot is going to be less than a half inch in diameter, I am concerned that the misalignment would stand out if I used a .125” piece.

Next Up – Turning 1st & 2nd Test, Gluing Inlay Blank

No comments:

Post a Comment